| LOST JEEPS http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/ |
|
| Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=74066 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | mawlkrawler [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 5:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
I was jc if anyone had gone over 265 75 16's. I figured the only way you could is by forkin out the $$ for a 6" lift. But even still I feel like there would be some real rubbin. Has anyone hit the 33" mark which would be about 290 75 16's |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 10:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
6 inch lift regear to 4.88s and put up with all of the other quirks a KK has and there you go |
|
| Author: | DREDnot [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
Look into 235/85r16s. They usually run around 32.4" diameter but are only 9.5" wide.
|
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 11:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
DREDnot wrote: Look into 235/85r16s. They usually run around 32.4" diameter but are only 9.5" wide. What brand are those ? Most are in the 31.6 to 32 range |
|
| Author: | John3:17 [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
Says Goodyear Wrangler on side of tire |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 12:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
John3:17 wrote: Says Goodyear Wrangler on side of tire Now that he has posted a picture I see that wasn't there before ![]() MTRs are only 32s so was just trying to determine which ones are 32.4 |
|
| Author: | DREDnot [ Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
tommudd wrote: What brand are those ? Most are in the 31.6 to 32 range My bad. I was remembering the diameter of my 285/70 17s on my megacab diesel being almost 33s. The 235/85-16s MTRs were right at 32(static) on the liberty steelies. They were effectively 31.5" when the weight was on them. |
|
| Author: | mawlkrawler [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 1:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
tommudd wrote: 6 inch lift regear to 4.88s and put up with all of the other quirks a KK has and there you go Does anyone even make a 6" lift for a kk? Lol Sent from my iPhone 5 |
|
| Author: | Bmxer524 [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 2:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
I heard from some reliable sources that there might be one in the works... |
|
| Author: | heiliges [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 5:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
Would these sources happen to have said a timeline. I a month away from getting the 4" from jba. |
|
| Author: | mawlkrawler [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
Ouch that's rough. I wish JBA would announce something. I could really get down with a 6" lift Sent from my iPhone 5 |
|
| Author: | Bmxer524 [ Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
No clue on a timeline. I wouldn't guess any time soon though. Still a possibility that it might never happen so who knows. |
|
| Author: | mawlkrawler [ Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
DREDnot wrote: Look into 235/85r16s. They usually run around 32.4" diameter but are only 9.5" wide. ![]() Think you could get away with 245/90/16's? they'd be 33.4" with a 9.6" width. I feel like the turning radius of the wheels would prevent you not only going full lock but even turning correctly lol |
|
| Author: | DREDnot [ Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
Ive never heard of 90 aspect ratio tires in normal light truck or passenger sizes. Maybe the 7.50-16 size is around that 33-34 size. They probably are too big to fit and pretty spendy. http://www.expeditionexchange.com/equal/DCP_1268.jpg |
|
| Author: | mawlkrawler [ Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
Haha now that I think about it ya they would be kind of a weird size. Sent from my iPhone 5 |
|
| Author: | Nferr [ Sun Feb 17, 2013 9:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
A 6 inch lift would be nice I have decide if nothing comes out bybthe time summer I'm having one fabricated. I want to maintain the front upper and lower control arms in the form of a long travel front suspension similar to a baja suspension and in the rear a long arm suspension. Teraflex sells all the suspension components which would cover the rear and the front would have to be full custom I run a 31x11.5x15 |
|
| Author: | Chipppy [ Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
What is the differences in the kj and kk for the 6in??? I didn't know there was that much different in the suspension |
|
| Author: | KK4x4 [ Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
If the front ends are the same can we just order the 6" jba for the front and then the KK 6" springs for the back then some longer bilstines or something? |
|
| Author: | tommudd [ Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
Chipppy wrote: What is the differences in the kj and kk for the 6in??? I didn't know there was that much different in the suspension rear suspension is different, front UCAs are different and a few more things. |
|
| Author: | Bmxer524 [ Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Anyone dared to go over 265 75 16's? |
I could imagine killing CVs at 6" unless you machine them or maybe drop the diff a little, or something else. Idk what the 6" KJ lift entails. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|