detroit_doc wrote:
Yep, my Frankenlift trashed my upper ball joints in short order. That's why I ripped it off. CV failures, CV boot failures, upper ball joint contact, zero suspension sag that is downright dangerous on choppy paved roads, etc. There are WAY too many backyard engineers without proper training or experience making stuff for the libby.
Before buying a lift I would suggest you ask to see the credentials (degrees, work experience, etc) of the mechanical engineer who designed it and the CAD drawings of it. My guess is 90% of the companies that make stuff for the libby won't be able to provide either. Maybe they will be able to provide a bar napkin with a drawing drawn by a high school drop out. But I suspect that may even be asking too much for some of these "designs".
Well, I will say that the "Frankenlift" was designed after a number of different combinations. It is still one of the best options available for the KJ. Two things that affect the success of any lift are:
1) Letting the vendor know what your problem is with a product. I know that AllJs will work with clients to come up with a solution as best they can. If you just discount this process of feedback, you are getting only 50% value IMHO.
2) The other thing to note is that different KJ's react differently to lifts. I know it sounds wierd, but some KJs get a 1" more lift from the same parts as others. Different KJs actually come with different springs ( rates ect. ) . Sometimes lifts need to be taylored to a specific KJ.
Lifting is not an exact science. CAD designs can make the parts identical, but it won't make each KJ identical. The other part of the problem is the KJ itself...ie...Small Wheelwells, tight clearances for the UCA, inherent weakness of the "OEM" BallJoints, ect. Point is there are many factors to cinsider and what works for one might not work for another.