I have been assembling a little table of some of the AT tires that are available with their relative weights and heights. I am a bit concerned that a significant wieght increase would drastically lower fuel economy. When I went from the stock SR/A tire to a silent armor, my fuel economy went down by about 2 MPG. That sucked. I found an article at Tire Rack about performance cars and tire/wheel weight. Check it out here:
http://www.tirerack.com/wheels-techpage-1/108.shtml Look at the table at the bottom for the fuel economy information. Basically, a 17% increase in tire/wheel weight decreased fuel economy by 7.5%.
So I threw together this little comparison to see what the best size/weight tradeoff might be.
My surmise...the 235/75R16 for the following reasons:
Narrower tire increases contact patch pressure for better snow performance
Weighs the least of decent AT tires, so fuel economy hit will be less
Good compromise on height..not as tall as 245/75, but taller than 245/70
Available in the well regarded Destination AT
_________________
_________
Trailpixie
http://www.trailpixie.net
04 Limited with offroad package
Frankenlifted
