greiswig - I'll keep you all posted. My experience this past year using the blend in an HPCR DI rig has been positive.
I've been running the WVO blend in a 2004.5 Cummins diesel for almost a year now, and it's a common-rail setup, though it runs higher pressures on the rail than I've seen quoted for the CRD. I think the max rail pressure for the Cummins engine, stock, is in the 24,000-26,000 PSI range and idle is around 6,000PSI. I've not experienced any of the disastrous problems such as stuck rings, polymerized oil, gummed injectors, etc - and I've done oil analysis on every-other oil change. They come up clean using a 5,000mi change interval.
We live outside of town, and typically experience 20-25k miles/year on each of our rigs (Mom & I). So, you should see the 50k mark you mention late 2008 or early 2009...
Another advantage I have is that being 'out of town', it's 25 miles to the big city (Vancouver, WA) and 35 to Portland Oregon. So - the truck always gets up to temp when it is started - there are essentially no short hops. I'm sure that helps too.
We're keeping the fuel viscosity down with a blend formula that's been proven in diesels in Europe (see Hans Schur blend; they even tore down the engines), and proven with my rig and others. For example, CJ on the Turbo-Diesel Register forum, has two HPCR Dodge Diesels (04 & 05) running even longer/more miles than I on blended fuel. CJ has also removed and inspected the injectors, and looked at the cylinder walls with a scope.
We both run no more than 50/50 in the winter, when the ambient temps drop into the 40's and lower. In his case, Great Falls Montana (!) where it gets below zero routinely in the winter. We both have great supplies of clean and reasonably dry used oil, which we then dry/filter/blend carefully to keep it that way. Not everyone has that luxury either.
For the above reasons, I believe that the risk is a reasonable one and expect that with due care we will not experience any significant problems. We will of course monitor it closely as we have been. I'm sure it's not a good option for everyone, but thus far it's worked well for us.
I almost forgot to add that I took the Cummins in for emission testing today (renewal time), and it passed with 3% out of a maximum 20% opacity test under load on a dyno (Washington State's test for diesels); the tank was filled approx 75% WVO blend and 25% #2 ULSD today for the testing.
Thanks,
Mark
---
greiswig wrote:
PS - to the guy running RUG/WVO in his Libby: I'd love to hear a report back on your experiences after 50k miles or so. I sure wouldn't do that to any newer diesel engine and expect it to last a long time.