It is currently Sat Sep 13, 2025 10:48 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 387 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 20  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: MPG?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:19 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie

Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 5:57 pm
Posts: 679
I'm contemplating which to do first... upgrade the tranny or replace the stocker tires on my 06' Limited. Can any of the folks who have had this done post some mpg numbers?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Transimission Cooler
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:16 am 
Offline
LOST Newbie

Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 6:55 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Wisconsin
Does anyone know if the Transmission Cooler/ AC condenser that comes with the new pump is any different or better?
Is it worth having the shop install it? I'm getting my SunCoast put in Monday - can't wait.

_________________
2006 CRD Sport Khaki

Lift Pump, Fuel Cooler
Raycor: head, filter, heater
Provent, ORM
SunCoast, TransGo, 2007 pump, B&M stacked plate tranny cooler
V6 Airbox, Wix Filter
AirLift 1000 Rear Air Bags
Fia front cover

Coming soon:
Fuel cooler bypass valve
InMotion tuning
new muffler
300,000 miles here I come


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 9:11 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 1830
Location: Spokane, WA
retmil46 wrote:
Well, I've changed my mind over the past few days as to my preferred course of action. After consulting with a few people off-list, and seeing more and more reports of F37 turning into a total fiasco, I've decided not to take my CRD anywhere near the dealership, at least until (hopefully) F37 is superceded by an honest fix (not much hope there IMHO) or being a CSN it quietly fades into history.

Oldnavy's report was the final straw. If a former service manager who is on a first-name basis with the service techs, and stands the best chance IMO of having the work done properly and eliminating the human factor, still ends up having serious problems, that tells me it is F37 itself that is flawed.

The ball joints appear to be a no-brainer, Moog being the preferred aftermarket choice, and from one report I've read at one time was actually the OEM supplier for Jeep.

For the transmission, we seem well within reach of an aftermarket solution, both in hardware and software.

Bottom line is, where possible, I've decided to have nothing to do with DC's warranty fixes to this vehicle.


I guess I am lucky. When it came to the F37 my dealer gave me the option and they were obviously not encouraging me to have it done. Since I was already there myself I of course agreed.

Some here have mentioned that doing the F37 was not an option for the dealer. I am not sure where that thought comes from. This is still listed as a customer satisfaction issue not a recall. There may be some confusion between this and the F31 which was required if the previous TSB had been done which disabled a lot of the OBD code access which violated federal laws. My Liberty is running just fine and I am sure it will continue to until I have the $$$ to do the Suncoast and find a tranny shop good enough to do it.

_________________
Dave

'06 CRD Limited, Lt. Khaki, MOPAR Slush Mats/Skids, DrawTite Front Hitch, Mag Lite, Yakima Bars, Thule Bike Rack, Fumoto, ORM, 245/70 Revo 2

Wish list: Lift, Boulder Bars, Something Bigger in the Front and Back, More Lights


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jun 13, 2007 10:25 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 5171
Location: Austin, TX
I think the F37 Torque converter was an option - but I don't think the Flash was - it was also part of the F31 - which was a 'recall' and advertised as allowing aftermarket scanners to read the error codes - an emission requirement for most states. It also electronically changed the lockup.

At any time - if a dealer connects your computer to the Chrysler mainframe - it downloads the latest available - no options - latest greatest - period - standard computer upgrade stuff.

The Suncoast gets around this by being mechanically locked 400 rpm before it's electronically locked.
so I've ordered the parts - they haven't arrived yet - but soon I'll get my fun to drive Jeep back.

_________________
2005 CRD
stuff
Skeptic quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:16 pm 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 759
Location: Lake Orion MI
ATXKJ wrote:

The Suncoast gets around this by being mechanically locked 400 rpm before it's electronically locked.
so I've ordered the parts - they haven't arrived yet - but soon I'll get my fun to drive Jeep back.


I'd be interested to know how that happens. From what I know of transmissions / torque converters, the torque converter clutch doesn't actuate until it recieves pressure from the transmission. That doesn't happen until an electronic command.

_________________
2005 CRD Limited Flame Red w/ Renegade rock rails & light bar, AirLift 1000. 225/75R16 MT/R's on cheap black steel wheels, dual MOPAR subwoofers, Ipod kit & seat covers, Samco hoses - totaled and gone. 2008 WK Laredo 3.0L diesel - AirLift 1000, wife won't let me mess with it much. 2013 JK Sahara on order.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:38 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 1137
Quote:
That doesn't happen until an electronic command.


Unless something like a professional TransGo Shiftkit modifies the pressure setting in the tranny pump, via a new set of pressure relief springs, at which the TC lockup occurs, as well as modifying where shift points occur with new springs in the valve body. For the home version, they supply a resistor to change the pump line pressure.

Then there is the matter of the torque multiplier in the TC bringing on more power faster due to higher efficiency and more torque multiplication at the same engine rpm and electronic setpoints from the TCM.

_________________
2005 LTD CRD RB1 NAV/Htd Leather seats/Amsoil EA filters
SunCoast Mega Trans & Billet TC/PML pan/Aux cooler
Fuel cooler/Lift Pump/10um Pri/Racor R490 2um Sec Fuel Filters
IronMan Lift/Shocks/Provent/Moog ball joints/ V6 Airbox/Fan/Hayden
Cobalt Boost/EGT/Oil/Trans/Volt gauges/Aeroturbine 2525
Yeti Hot Tune/Odessey 65/Samco's/Michelin Defenders


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 7:49 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 5:31 pm
Posts: 163
Location: buckeye AZ
my theory on the tranny going thunk, and kicking down.


This happens to me often, i believe so much so that i can reproduce it regualrly. I first took my CRD in to the tranny guy at the dodge dealer, he said everything was fine, but did mention that the programed shift point from 4th to 5th is 62mph. If i put it in cruise OR drive it w/ my foot, let it shift into 5th then back off to about 62+ mph ish like 63 ro 66mph ish, 63 works best.... i think the transmission is trying to shift down when the load threshold hits a point, but sometimes it gets confused or there's a software bug and it shifts to 3rd rather than 4th, the more extreem wheel speed to engine speed differential causes the thunk, just like you can get from shifting from neutral at 65 to drive.... But if you turn off overdrive at 63mph you will notice the rpm's are the same as the post thunk, vroom! event.....

So here are my conclusions:

1) when at the shift threshold of 4th and 5th gear (63 or 64mph ish), car decides somtimes to go from 5th to 3rd... silly jeep!!! =)
2) I believe this is a purly software driven event and can be corrected or at least reduced w/ ecu update of some type
3) This is a classic modified toruqe flite tranny w/ the electronic overdrive mod problem of constantly hunting for the right gear. trying to decide to shift the 3 speed part of the tranny or the 2 speed overdrive module hidden in the tranny.
4) the tranny was never intended to work w/ a diesel where the torque to power curves are so very different from a gasser. so even the right software cant really get this tranny to operate at the vehicle's fullest potential.

Im sure im only reitterating many opinions on this thread, but after scanning through several posts, i wanted to share my thoughts on the "5th to 3rd bug" that i will herein call this problem many of us are having.

o8k

_________________
2008 Tacoma:
4.0-liter DOHC EFI V6 with VVT-i ... 236hp 266Ft-lbs
265-70R16 BFG Rugged Trail (stock).... Rear Locker (stock)
Bilstine 2.5" lift front + ProComp AAL 2" lift rear
LIFT #s Front engine skid 12" @Rear Diff 10.5" @running board 21" @tx case 16"
6spd Manual Tranny
http://o8k.ifp3.com <-- My Photo gallery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:51 pm 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 759
Location: Lake Orion MI
Ranger1 wrote:
Quote:
That doesn't happen until an electronic command.


Unless something like a professional TransGo Shiftkit modifies the pressure setting in the tranny pump, via a new set of pressure relief springs, at which the TC lockup occurs, as well as modifying where shift points occur with new springs in the valve body. For the home version, they supply a resistor to change the pump line pressure.

Then there is the matter of the torque multiplier in the TC bringing on more power faster due to higher efficiency and more torque multiplication at the same engine rpm and electronic setpoints from the TCM.


The transmission in the CRD is a 545RFE. The RFE stands for Rear (wheel drive) Full Electronic. Shift points and torque converter lockup are soley determined by software. Trust me on that one. 'Shift kits' are for hydraulically controlled transmissions with a governor and throttle valve. You also won't appreciably change the shift quality (firmer shifts) either, because the transmission adjusts clutch actuation to match pre-programmed acceleration targets. In my opinion, a shift kit for an electronically controlled transmission is snake oil.

You are correct in concept about the torque converter, if not in terminology. A 'tighter' torque converter actually has less torque multiplication, but greater efficiency. This greater efficiency transmits crankshaft torque more directly to the transmission, with less torque multiplication and less overall power loss.

_________________
2005 CRD Limited Flame Red w/ Renegade rock rails & light bar, AirLift 1000. 225/75R16 MT/R's on cheap black steel wheels, dual MOPAR subwoofers, Ipod kit & seat covers, Samco hoses - totaled and gone. 2008 WK Laredo 3.0L diesel - AirLift 1000, wife won't let me mess with it much. 2013 JK Sahara on order.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:52 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 1137
Quote:
Shift points and torque converter lockup are soley determined by software.


Not entirely true, especially in real world environments, with lowest cost vendors supplying mass production TC's. The TCM software is part of a system, and is radically affected by the quality of the hardware it is working with. Since TC lockup isn't just a simple "LOCK" at a specific rpm, going from full unlocked to full locked, but is electronically modulated as lockup speed/rpm is approached, the coupling characteristics of the TC clutch will dramatically affect TC lockup behavior and the real rpm at which it occurs. A point I notice you fail to mention. Or possibly don't realize.

The TCM software uses sensors and feedback from the mechanicals of the transmission to "tell" it when to shift. If you modify the mechanical behavior you indirectly affect the TCM programming and affect a change in shift performance. Notice what I said in underline text below - that modifed pump pressure at which TC lockup occurs, as well as the accumulator spring rate can modify the shifting behavior. The italic word "where" should have been "when." But I stand by my assertion that a higher quality TC can lockup and stay locked at a lower rpm than a loose, poor quality TC regardless of the software trying to adjust for mechanical variance and cvi's. Especially when the same line pressure keeps one TC locked(and resulting engine rpm low) and another lower quality TC slips badly at the same rpm, then "tells" the TCM that the engine rpm is too high for what the TCM is willing to accept for a given tc lock range.

With the TC/shiftkit mod, in reality, TC lockup performance at lower speeds is more positive, lacking the slop present in the factory TC, and comes earlier in the shift/rpm curve. It doesn't matter what the software attempts to do or is programmed to do, if the stock TC hardware isn't able to handle it effectively. I believe that is the heart of the CRD TC issue - not software problems, just cheap TC hardware.

If the TC lockup was soley affected by software alone and using a fixed rpm point, this would not be possible. But since the TC clutch lockup is electronically modulated as it approaches lockup, the lockup behavior of TC and the rpm at which it occurs is highly affected by the amount of slip/loss present in the TC. As you know, the factory TC has lots of slip (or slop, whichever term you prefer). It is far from optimized or even consistent in behavior from TC to TC, as I learned from having 2 factory TC's in a 12 month period. Major driving behavioral changes from one TC to another factory TC, and neither one very good. Where was the software control on that one? Lockup behavior was so bad on the 2nd oem TC that I could not even feel the 62 mph lock. Ever. It sorta of wallowed into high gear is the best description I can think of. With the SunCoast/Shiftkit snakeoil combination, it is now a crisp, definite pleasant shift, with a definite slight tachometer drop. Same software. Radically better performance.

While the TCM program rpm shiftpoints are not modified, the TC lockup holding behavior is much improved with the new TC/shiftkit, especially at lower rpm, I believe from improved modulated lockup behavior just prior to full TC lockup. It may in fact end up locking at lower rpm than the factory TC due to the excessive locking/unlocking slipping syndrome that the factory TC suffers from.

While what you state should be true in theory in a perfect transmission design, I believe is not happening in real world driving due to excessive slip/looseness/parasitic loss in the factory TC, preventing the TCM from keeping the TC lockup duty cycle high enough as it approaches programmed lockup points. Those very electronic controls are directly affected/somewhat overwhelmed by the poor factory TC performance.

So while the programming is not changed, the lockup behavior is altered for the better and TC lockup is occurring more often and at lower rpm than with the factory TC.

Regards,

Ranger1

Unless something like a professional TransGo Shiftkit modifies the pressure setting in the tranny pump, via a new set of pressure relief springs, at which the TC lockup occurs, as well as modifying where shift points occur with new springs in the valve body. For the home version, they supply a resistor to change the pump line pressure.

Then there is the matter of the torque multiplier in the TC bringing on more power faster due to higher efficiency and more torque multiplication at the same engine rpm and electronic setpoints from the TCM.


[/quote]

_________________
2005 LTD CRD RB1 NAV/Htd Leather seats/Amsoil EA filters
SunCoast Mega Trans & Billet TC/PML pan/Aux cooler
Fuel cooler/Lift Pump/10um Pri/Racor R490 2um Sec Fuel Filters
IronMan Lift/Shocks/Provent/Moog ball joints/ V6 Airbox/Fan/Hayden
Cobalt Boost/EGT/Oil/Trans/Volt gauges/Aeroturbine 2525
Yeti Hot Tune/Odessey 65/Samco's/Michelin Defenders


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2007 11:52 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 8:23 am
Posts: 3544
Location: New Braunfels, Texas
The reason it hooks up better than the stock TC is that it reacts properly when "told" to lockup. Quality pieces gives quality results. The software might "tell" the hardware when to react to an input, but it is the hardware that does the work. The Suncoast TC works better by all reports and it makes sense.

If you think the software is in control and solely determines how the tranny works then the stock TC would work...In fact, any old TC would work and we know that is not true.

_________________
Founder of L.O.S.T.
2006 CRD Sport

Mods: GDE Hot Tune w/ 364#@2000rpm/Air Box /3" Str8 Exhaust/ASFIR Alum Skids/245-75R-16 Cooper STT PRO/OME LIFT w/Clevis & 4 Spring Isos/AirTabs/Rigid 10" S2 LED/4xGuard Ctr Matrix Bumper
Drag Strip:Reac=.1078_60ft=2.224_1/8=10.39@64.8mph_1/4+16.46@80.8mph


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 12:45 pm 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 759
Location: Lake Orion MI
Ranger1 wrote:
Since TC lockup isn't just a simple "LOCK" at a specific rpm, going from full unlocked to full locked, but is electronically modulated as lockup speed/rpm is approached, the coupling characteristics of the TC clutch will dramatically affect TC lockup behavior and the real rpm at which it occurs. A point I notice you fail to mention. Or possibly don't realize.

Torque converter lockup is a closed loop control system. In the first phase the trans controller attempts to pull the engine down to a fixed rpm of slip across the converter. In the second phase the trans controller actually locks the converter after a fixed time delay. If the engine rpm is lower, phase one happens more quickly.

Ranger1 wrote:
So while the programming is not changed, the lockup behavior is altered for the better and TC lockup is occurring more often and at lower rpm than with the factory TC.


Torque converter lockup is occurring at a lower engine rpm with the Suncoast converter I'll agree. Why? Because with a more efficient torque converter, the engine has to spin at a lower rpm to generate the same amount of output torque (what the driver is requesting to go down the road).

My statement that the point at where shifts / lockups occur is soley determined by software I'm standing by. Shift points are determined by vehicle speed and accelerator pedal position. Torque converter lockup also adds a minimum engine speed qualifier. Apparent changes in shift points could be because the engine rpm for a given torque converter torque output (translated to the wheels through the transmission) is lower, but the computer is only looking at vehicle speed for transmission shifting, not engine speed.

I'll also stand by the 'shift kits are snake oil' for closed loop, electronically controlled transmissions.

Don't get me wrong, I'm very interested in getting a Suncoast converter for my CRD. One will probably be in mine as soon as I can afford it.

_________________
2005 CRD Limited Flame Red w/ Renegade rock rails & light bar, AirLift 1000. 225/75R16 MT/R's on cheap black steel wheels, dual MOPAR subwoofers, Ipod kit & seat covers, Samco hoses - totaled and gone. 2008 WK Laredo 3.0L diesel - AirLift 1000, wife won't let me mess with it much. 2013 JK Sahara on order.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 1:15 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 2:01 am
Posts: 1944
Location: Mooresville, NC
Not entirely snake oil. There are at least a couple mechanical items that the Transgo shift kit addresses. One I can remember offhand is a stouter backing plate for the solenoids and springs in the valve body.

Let's put it this way - if the Transgo shift kit didn't have some useful function or address a particular problem, if it was indeed snake oil - then Bruce would be the first person to tell you not to bother with it.

There's been more than one time over the last 10 years that Bruce could have easily made money off of me by just keeping his mouth shut and going along with one of my ideas or questions regarding the tranny in one of our vehicles. Instead, he spoke up and said "Don't bother, it won't do anything useful and it's a waste of time and money".

If Bruce feels that the Transgo shift kit does perform a useful function in some way, and that it is worth the time, effort, and money to put it in - that's good enough for me.

_________________
Mitchell Oates
'87 MB 300D Diamond Blue Metallic
'87 MB 300D - R.I.P. 12/08
'05 Sport CRD Stone White
Provent CCV Filter/AT2525 Muffler
Stanadyne 30 u/Cat 2 u Fuel Filters
Fumoto Drain/Fleetguard LF3487 Oil filter
V6 Airbox/Amsoil EAA Air Filter
Suncoast TC/Shift Kit/Aux Cooler
Kennedy Lift Pump/Return Fuel Cooler


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 3:02 pm 
Offline
LOST Junkie

Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:39 pm
Posts: 676
Location: Saylorsburg, PA
We picked up our 2006 CRD from the transmission shop last night. We had the Suncoast TC and TransGo shift kit installed. To be honest, the Suncoast TC is more subtle than I was expecting. I kept picturing this thing lugging up hills at 1700rpm and cruising along at 1400rpm, and it's not quite like that.

If you floor it, it'll still scream at 3000+rpm, and medium throttle will still put you over 2000rpm. What I do notice is that in casual driving when you are not demanding much from the engine, it is much happier to loaf along at low RPM. For example, I was cruising up a slight hill at 45mph just out of lockup, and the engine was turning just 1700 RPM. With the old torque converter, the revs would be over 2000rpm even cruising along at this same speed on flat ground. Now I don't feel compelled to do the "speed up to 54mph to lock up, then slow back down" in 50mph traffic anymore; it doesn't feel like I am wasting fuel any time I'm not locked up.

I haven't had much seat time, as it's my wife's daily driver. She noticed the difference enough to call me from work and tell me that she likes it. The best way I can describe it is that the drivetrain doesn't seem anxious and high-strung anymore. There is a bit more lag off the line, but it has some relearning to do. Other folks say the driveability will improve as the TCM and engine computers adapt. (When we picked it up, the radio needed its time reset, etc.) I will keep everyone posted on our observed mileage.

- Chris


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:02 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 1830
Location: Spokane, WA
chrispitude wrote:
We picked up our 2006 CRD from the transmission shop last night. We had the Suncoast TC and TransGo shift kit installed. To be honest, the Suncoast TC is more subtle than I was expecting. I kept picturing this thing lugging up hills at 1700rpm and cruising along at 1400rpm, and it's not quite like that.

If you floor it, it'll still scream at 3000+rpm, and medium throttle will still put you over 2000rpm. What I do notice is that in casual driving when you are not demanding much from the engine, it is much happier to loaf along at low RPM. For example, I was cruising up a slight hill at 45mph just out of lockup, and the engine was turning just 1700 RPM. With the old torque converter, the revs would be over 2000rpm even cruising along at this same speed on flat ground. Now I don't feel compelled to do the "speed up to 54mph to lock up, then slow back down" in 50mph traffic anymore; it doesn't feel like I am wasting fuel any time I'm not locked up.

I haven't had much seat time, as it's my wife's daily driver. She noticed the difference enough to call me from work and tell me that she likes it. The best way I can describe it is that the drivetrain doesn't seem anxious and high-strung anymore. There is a bit more lag off the line, but it has some relearning to do. Other folks say the driveability will improve as the TCM and engine computers adapt. (When we picked it up, the radio needed its time reset, etc.) I will keep everyone posted on our observed mileage.

- Chris


I am sure you will notice additional changes as the computers re-learn the way you drive. My stocker is still just running fine but reading these posts is making me wonder if I should change.

_________________
Dave

'06 CRD Limited, Lt. Khaki, MOPAR Slush Mats/Skids, DrawTite Front Hitch, Mag Lite, Yakima Bars, Thule Bike Rack, Fumoto, ORM, 245/70 Revo 2

Wish list: Lift, Boulder Bars, Something Bigger in the Front and Back, More Lights


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:12 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 1137
Quote:
Torque converter lockup is a closed loop control system. In the first phase the trans controller attempts to pull the engine down to a fixed rpm of slip across the converter. In the second phase the trans controller actually locks the converter after a fixed time delay. If the engine rpm is lower, phase one happens more quickly.


What happens when the controller can't get a stable, consistent, acceptable fixed slip value reading from its closed loop? Perhaps TC lock/unlock undesirable behavior, words taken from the first of 3 TSB's issued in early 2005 to address poor TC lockup performance. Software can only do what it's written to do. If the hardware doesn't cooperate, then you have... a CRD series of failed tranny software updates, culminating in a TC/F37 experience from Chrysler. Which, I might add, does not approach the drive quality of a decent TC/shiftkit combination.

If you can accept that physical design and construction of TC hardware can affect the engine rpm lockup speed due to more efficient fluid coupling through the converter, then think about the affect of altering transmission oil pressure on both shifting and TC lockup clutches. Changing the tranny oil pressure can have a positive effect on transmission shift performance and driveability.

Chrysler does it on the 545RFE depending on which engine its attached to - this is documented in Chryslers own (5)45RFE diagnostic manual. The upshift, downshift, in-gear and TC lockup pressure is different on the 3.7L/4.7L engines from the Hemi 5.7L V8.

Now if Chrysler alters these parameters, it's engineering, but if a shiftkit alters the same parameters, it's snake oil? I don't think so. If it were snake oil, there should be no difference in shift quality - none at all with a shiftkit. The software should negate any and all changes to the shift quality and performance if its capable of doing so, in favor of its own programming. I think you're assuming that the software is capable of adjusting any hardware parameters to it's own programming values - which clearly isn't the case. The fact that there is an improvement in shift quality says otherwise. Even from those who still have their oem TC.

If you want to do more than post opinions on shiftkits, telling those with those with real world experience that its snake oil, then pop for a $60 shifkit, install it on a Saturday afternoon, then see what the difference is in real world driving. Otherwise, you're just offering an opinion against experience.

_________________
2005 LTD CRD RB1 NAV/Htd Leather seats/Amsoil EA filters
SunCoast Mega Trans & Billet TC/PML pan/Aux cooler
Fuel cooler/Lift Pump/10um Pri/Racor R490 2um Sec Fuel Filters
IronMan Lift/Shocks/Provent/Moog ball joints/ V6 Airbox/Fan/Hayden
Cobalt Boost/EGT/Oil/Trans/Volt gauges/Aeroturbine 2525
Yeti Hot Tune/Odessey 65/Samco's/Michelin Defenders


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:31 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 1137
Chris,

I noticed the same thing. About 2 weeks after I had mine done, CRDMike had his done at the same shop and he let me drive his CRD after it was upgraded. I noticed that his shift changes were less pronounced than what mine had adjusted to. Mine also kept improving daily for nearly a month. After a week or two, try it on WOT on an Interstate ramp and notice how fast the shifts come on and how much lockup you feel while accelerating. CRDMike and I spoke this afternoon and he says that his adjusted over time as well.

The law of unintended consequences has come into play as a result of this upgrade however. My wife is now constantly borrowing my CRD - and she has her own Liberty V6 to drive. Before the upgrade, she flatly refused to drive it - she didn't like how long it took to get across an intersection and felt it was unsafe.

She even took it one day last weekend while I was taking a nap! I woke up and it was gone! I'm going to have to hide the keys!

_________________
2005 LTD CRD RB1 NAV/Htd Leather seats/Amsoil EA filters
SunCoast Mega Trans & Billet TC/PML pan/Aux cooler
Fuel cooler/Lift Pump/10um Pri/Racor R490 2um Sec Fuel Filters
IronMan Lift/Shocks/Provent/Moog ball joints/ V6 Airbox/Fan/Hayden
Cobalt Boost/EGT/Oil/Trans/Volt gauges/Aeroturbine 2525
Yeti Hot Tune/Odessey 65/Samco's/Michelin Defenders


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2007 5:13 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 5:42 am
Posts: 2121
Location: Fort Collins, CO
danoid wrote:
The transmission in the CRD is a 545RFE. The RFE stands for Rear (wheel drive) Full Electronic. Shift points and torque converter lockup are soley determined by software. Trust me on that one. 'Shift kits' are for hydraulically controlled transmissions with a governor and throttle valve. You also won't appreciably change the shift quality (firmer shifts) either, because the transmission adjusts clutch actuation to match pre-programmed acceleration targets. In my opinion, a shift kit for an electronically controlled transmission is snake oil.

You are correct in concept about the torque converter, if not in terminology. A 'tighter' torque converter actually has less torque multiplication, but greater efficiency. This greater efficiency transmits crankshaft torque more directly to the transmission, with less torque multiplication and less overall power loss.


Fully electronic may be in the name, but it's not fully electronically controlled. I personally installed my trans-go kit, and if you've ever had a valve body apart on your bench you'll know there's a great deal of mechanical control - fluid pressure vs. spring pressure. I agree with your statement that shift points are function of vehicle speed and throttle position - shift points don't change with the trans-go. Only the quickness and quality of the shifts change. I think a lot of people are going to get the suncoast TC and the shift kit installed at the same time and confuse the effects of the two.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Will SunCoast recommend an installer?
PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:19 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:03 pm
Posts: 228
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Those of you who know the folks at Sun Coast....

I'm sure they ship their TCs all over the country. If asked, do you think they'd share
the names of shops in the Phoenix metro area who've ordered CRD TCs? I'd really like
to get this mod done, but am not going to hand my Libby to a wet behind the ears kid in
some random transmission shop.

_________________
2006 Dk. Khaki Limited (BD 4/18/06)
-Mopar Tow Pkg. and Skids
-Magnaflow
-Fumoto Valve
-Provent 200, ORM
-Rotella T 5w/40
-V6 Air Box
-245/70/16 Cooper Discoverer CTS
-Amsoil EAA201 air filter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:33 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:55 pm
Posts: 759
Location: Lake Orion MI
Ranger1 wrote:
If you want to do more than post opinions on shiftkits, telling those with those with real world experience that its snake oil, then pop for a $60 shifkit, install it on a Saturday afternoon, then see what the difference is in real world driving. Otherwise, you're just offering an opinion against experience.


danoid wrote:
In my opinion, a shift kit for an electronically controlled transmission is snake oil.

At the risk of further upsetting the world, I might remind Ranger1 that all I did was offer an opinion.

I feel I've experienced firm 'shift kit' shifts every time I unhitch my trailer after a day of tugging. After a day of regular driving, the shifts learn back to their pre-programmed butter state. I find no reason to believe that the same couldn't happen after installing a shift kit.

Ranger1 wrote:
Changing the tranny oil pressure can have a positive effect on transmission shift performance and driveability.

And a negative effect on fuel economy. Pump pressure is created by dragging the engine to power a pump.

Why is the first assumption always that aftermarket is inherently better than OEM? If any OEM vehicle manufacturer could produce a 1000 horsepower / 100 mile per gallon car, THEY WOULD. Just to crush the competition. Every component is a compromise between cost, quality, fuel economy, durability, and getting it to market. If someone wants to modify their vehicle to suit their individual purpose, fine. Just don't get upset if others don't necessarily agree.

BTW usually the biggest compromise IS cost. There is often a better (more expensive) piece available. But no car company in the world is going to buy $45k of parts to build a $30k car.

_________________
2005 CRD Limited Flame Red w/ Renegade rock rails & light bar, AirLift 1000. 225/75R16 MT/R's on cheap black steel wheels, dual MOPAR subwoofers, Ipod kit & seat covers, Samco hoses - totaled and gone. 2008 WK Laredo 3.0L diesel - AirLift 1000, wife won't let me mess with it much. 2013 JK Sahara on order.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:17 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 7:40 pm
Posts: 1137
Quote:
Why is the first assumption always that aftermarket is inherently better than OEM?


LOL!! I don't know about that! In my case, it was after 2 OEM TC's failed (2nd one started slipping and making grinding noises very similar to what the first one did shortly before falling apart) before 30K miles had rolled around, I turned to aftermarket.

In the case of my 02 Liberty, the TC is still running without problems - I have no plans to replace it as it's doing its job. But if it failed tomorrow, you can be sure it wouldn't be a standard Chrysler TC that would replace it.

Sounds like possibly you are or were associated with an OEM supplier or vendor. It's pretty simple logic with me - if I buy it from anyone (you, Chrysler, or SunCoast) and it runs well and stays together for a reasonable length of time, I'm happy with it. If not, I'll either sell it, trade it, or in this case, look elsewhere for quality replacement parts if I want to keep the vehicle.

And at the end of the day, it's just machinery. If I offended you, my apologies.

_________________
2005 LTD CRD RB1 NAV/Htd Leather seats/Amsoil EA filters
SunCoast Mega Trans & Billet TC/PML pan/Aux cooler
Fuel cooler/Lift Pump/10um Pri/Racor R490 2um Sec Fuel Filters
IronMan Lift/Shocks/Provent/Moog ball joints/ V6 Airbox/Fan/Hayden
Cobalt Boost/EGT/Oil/Trans/Volt gauges/Aeroturbine 2525
Yeti Hot Tune/Odessey 65/Samco's/Michelin Defenders


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 387 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 ... 20  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com