Threeweight wrote:
Cowpie1 wrote:
believe it is more just plain stupidity on Detroit, political aspirations of idiots, and the tree hugging community. What an ugly combination.
As a confirmed hugger of trees (and salmon, elk, and the occasional muley), I'd point out that it is the tree huggers that are pushing bio-diesel, and buying up Jetta, Golf, and Passat TDI's. Oh, and many Liberty CRD's as well.
Europe has strict air quality standards, and adopted low sulfer diesel long before the US did. IMO, the problem is that the US automakers have not wanted to invest in diesel technology, whether it is the new clean diesels (like VW and Honda seem to be able to make, but not the Big 3), or smaller diesels suitable for passenger cars and light trucks (there is a reason we are running motors made in Italy, not Michigan, in our Liberty CRD's.
Back when the Liberty CRD was canceled, Chrysler's PR people blamed clean air rules. According to the article, the real reason appears to be what many of us suspected-- the Libby CRD was an experiment to test the market, not a serious effort to bring a quality, high-mpg SUV to market in a sustained way.
The sad thing is that no auto maker would have to invest in developing
any new diesel technology. It's already been done by companies like VM
and Isusu. They would only have to buy the engines from a company
with experience in that area.
The reason the Big 3 are failing is because they dont listen to their
customers and continue to build vehicles based on the status quo of 20
years ago. Continuing to sell a product that has remained unchanged
for 20 years when their consumer base has changed dramatically
leaves the door open for any competitor to come in a steal thier buisness.