Jeger wrote:
So I guess 18" rims or even bigger would be a help as well... And I thought everyone was just doing it for looks...whodathunkit

Well, probably 99% of the people that do ARE doing it just for looks, and if you started talking to them about sidewall flex and rolling resistance would look at you as if you were speaking in tongues.
Hmm it's been a few years, but I seem to remember that if you went with larger rims and same overall diameter tire (ie, drastically shorter sidewall), the gents RR calculator DID show an improvement in rolling resistance.
But for doing it as cheaply as possible, then LT rated 60 or 80 psi tires in LR D or E would be much simpler than swapping out rims as well.
Also, with those huge rims and rubber band tires, there is a point of diminishing returns. You also have to look at the weight rating of the tires.
A gent with Goodyear's EV program told me many years ago about weight ratings and rolling resistance. He said low rolling resistance tires won't do you a bit of good if the tire's weight rating is maxed out supporting the vehicle.
He said to get the max reduction in rolling resistance, that vehicle weight should be 60% or less of the combined weight rating of all four tires. As long as you were below the 60% point, you'd get good results from tires designed for low RR. Above the 60% point, it wouldn't matter how well the tires were designed, they'd be seeing so much flexing for just trying to support the weight of the vehicle that everything else would be lost in the noise.
And that's where the LT tires would have an advantage again - an LT225/75 LR E tire is rated for over 2600 lbs. And as far as treadwear, those bloody things usually wear like iron.