glaspak845 wrote:
If I could raise a point against cross referencing your miles traveled against a GPS unit. Unless the GPS units are on the extremely expensive side (ie a professional surveyors setup) I think the error of our personal/car units is way more than the ~1%( our ODO are off. I have a hand held unit and you can see the satellites you're tracking as you use it, it also give a +/- in ft of your position (usually +/- 20ft depending on availability of satellites, although I have seen as good as +/- 3 ft). Now assuming the car units use these same satellites and plotting method as on my hand held which plots a "track" as you walk, hike, etc. you get that +/- error at every point along your track. To achieve the accuracy that the surveying units do, they must be over a set point for much longer than a hiker or vehicle is over it's point at which the data is recorded. I believe that using the ODO will give better and more "accurate" results as it knows your tire size and probably calculates distance based on trans revs or something more mathematical. I use the ODO readings usually and haven't cross references for the above reasons and have found the calculated MPG's to be well within the realm of the possibilty. However the calculated MPG's are way off from what the EVIC says.
Yes, it does use tire size and revs.
But tires are not all the same size and tires change size as they wear.
_________________
http://www.Colorado4Wheel.com
"Its not about what you can
DO with your Jeep, its about where you can
GO with your Jeep."
Knowledgeable - But Caustic