dieselenthusiast - I guarantee you that Chrysler spends at least that much if not considerably more on their new models for emissions testing. That figure sounds impressive to people who don't work for major corps, but working for one myself(albeit not in automotive) thats a pretty minor development investment for a product going to a large market. I guarantee you that my last project spent at least that on just legal/regulatory compliance alone.
As for Chrysler's competence, I don't see where they have messed up. The engine is not even a Chrysler design, and similarly weighted vehicles get approximatly the same mileage when put under the same requirements. Just to put it in perspective: The Mercedes R320CDI achieves an EPA estimate of 21 combined mpg, despite being lighter than our Liberty, far more aerodynamic, and having a more modern engine. The E320 sedan manages 26 mpg combined, despite being far lighter and far more aerodynamic. Even the Jetta TDI in manual only does 33mpg, and its a tiny car. Obviously I'm going by EPA estimates here and diesels outperform them a bit, but EPA estimates are what Mahindra is going to have to advertise in order to sell here(and they won't outperform them by any more significant a percentage than existing diesels do).
So, despite the average mileage of even the best small car diesels being in only the low 30's in the US market, Mahindra is going to create a SUV shaped like a brick, weighing nearly what our Liberty's weigh and magically get mileage superior to even the most efficient small car diesels? Seriously, you buy into that?
UFO - I think I may have found you some new customers for those carberators.
