Focus2010 wrote:
We all have our own opinions and definitions but..
I'm inclined to believe if there are patterns to the problems, such as the regulators or ball joints or steering rack mount bushings it's not a lemon but a design flaw.
What I heard was that Daimler intended to replace the Cherokee with it and when that was ruled out for whatever reason they decided to shave cost and make it more of an entry level vehicle, and that in the process they built weaknesses into it. I'm no expert on the mechanics or the history of the breed, but I AM an expert on auto parts and some stuff I sell a LOT of. I also spend 50 hours a week interacting with repair shops because that is my job and they tend to have strong opinions to support the designed weakness theory.
It's not bashing if there are specific examples to unending problems.
"This is a piece of junk" is bashing.
"These are the problems I've personally had with a PAMPERED version of this vehicle" is contributing info.
Yeah I've worked in the auto work for 13 years,the issues some have with the KJ(window regulators and LBJ's and such) are juts as common in other vehicles,may not be the same exact problems but every vehicle has it's issues.
Just a example is the pic of your Ford(F250 I believe) pickup,famously known for camber issues,bad balljoints,and starter solenoids.Now I owned a '84 F150 and it was one of the best vehicles I ever owned despite the known issues but others have said they where a big POS since they could not deal with the little problems.I was rough on my F150 also,overloaded it often and pulled twice it's rated towing capacity often but it never let me down,my KJ has been the same way,some small issues but nothing major enough to fault "bad design".