tjkj2002 wrote:
I don't need any data,real world experiences is better then a piece of paper.
What data do you have to say that syn is better then dyno gear oils?
Funny thing is you go by CATCRD,I imagine you have something to do with Caterpillar,which by they way mostly only recommends dino oils besides for there engines.
Wrong. Cat, Detroit, Cummins, International, Volvo, Mack, etc, in the last few years, have recommended synthetics. As does the Technology and Maintenance Council, which is the defacto trucking industry standards committee on maintenance issues in trucking.
What data? How about warranties extended 50% by drive train manufacturers if synthetic oil is used. They must have done the research to enable them to stick their neck out and extend a warranty from 500,000 to 750,000 miles on differentials and transmissions if synthetics are used.
I don't work for any of these manufacturers, I just have to pay out hundreds of thousands of dollars to them to buy their products. It costs me dearly to lose a diff or tranny in a semi. If Eaton recommends synthetics, and they give me 50% more warranty if I do so, that is solid enough for me.
Frankly, it amazes me that people who play with toy diesels seem to claim to have the inside skinny on what to use in these setups than those that their entire business' involve utilization of this and heavier equipment. Those business' have serious bucks on the line and don't have time to fiddle with silly "I know better than the manufacturer" arguments. The TMC has spent millions of dollars and countless hours researching these issues and has made some definitive statements regarding this. Their general consensus is that synthetics perform better than conventional lubricants and are recommended.
They have got more real world experience in this than all of us put together ever will.