arengant wrote:
dirtmover wrote:
OTOH look at some of the poor design (cost reduction) decisions made by Chrysler on our vehicle. Do you trust their choice of part?
This is what I was wondering, what parts did Chrysler chose over VM
Regardless of what VM put in the engine at their factory, and I'm sure the TB came pre-installed, we are still at the mercy of Chrysler as to what they supply as OEM replacement parts.
racertracer wrote:
dirtmover wrote:
Incidentally Gates recommend replacing at 60,000 miles or 6 years
Well that makes sense, since the thicker belt will put stress on the other parts reducing their life span.
If this is the case then the tensioner is not doing it's job correctly