Me-By-Myself-and-I wrote:
I question if the GDE Hot Tune could be placing too much stress on the motor to effectively cook the head. A good question would be, how many CRD's with head gasket failures ran with the GDE Hot Tune? We don't hear about head gasket failures in Europe.
True, but the CRD engines do seem to run fairly hot, with most failures related to failed lubricTion in the bottoms end.
I don't know if female of the ecu for more power are that common.
And the Cherokee CRD isn't really used for towing much in the UK that I have seen.
Small trailers is about it.
I suspect the demographics are different in both places. In the UK the Cherokee is considered a lifestyle vehicle by many, especially the later 2.8 auto, I think people were more likely to buy the 2.5 with a manual box for towing and when the vehicle was going to be used for work.
Perhaps the issue is related to the higher state of tune in the 2.8?
With things like the GDE tune pushing the top end past its design limits?
As all research I have done would indicate that the top ends are the same.
The 2.8 is still fitted to the Chrysler Voyager, I will do some checking and find out what the power of that is.
I suspect it is around the 150bhp level, the 2.5 VM in the TX4 is less than 120bhp.
Done a quick check 161 bhp and 265 ft/lbs. how does that compare with a GDE tuned Liberty?