WolverineFW wrote:
Great...at least you are qualified.
I have not stated an opinion either way...but I have not blatantly discounted it either based on conjecture and opinion as have some posters.
Considering a lot of modern diesel engines have wet sleeve liners as illustrated here...
https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&source=w ... fAUDDvKh6D....I would not discount the possibility of the immediate evacuation of the coolant could cause a liner failure. What is taking the place of said coolant???? Most likely ambient air, which is going to be cooler and have much less heat absorption capabilities. Relatively cool air replaces hot coolant....I would say it may be plausible.
And I don't have a PhD as I am sure most on here don't have either....but I do work with heat transfer daily as a Refrigeration mechanic. I am not expert....but likely very few on here are either...so the final point is people can type what ever they like on the internet....doesn't make it correct or true in any sense just because they believe it.
Sent from my SM-G965W using Tapatalk[/quote]
Its great to hear that you have some good understanding of the practicalities of heat transfer FW.
The air entering the engine has ample contact with coolant etc to warm before it hits the liner. The air has a very low heat capacity compared with the coolant, The heat transfer coefficient between the liner & the air is very low compared with that of for the coolant & the liner & conduction within the metal in the engine. In simple terms, that is why a liquid/liquid heat exchanger has a much smaller contact area than an air cooled one of the same duty. There would be a lot of water (coolant) vapor present that would be able to condense to keep the temperature up.
What is being suggested is a bit like saying that if metal like a liner at 212f is exposed to normal air temperature it could crack.
My thoughts are in this case are that the liner in question was already cracked.