nursecosmo wrote:
Fulltimer wrote:
Here is something I was thinking about. Drive 2 cars for say 1,000 miles. Car #1 gets 22mpg. Car #2 gets 90mpg. Over that 1,000 miles which one produces the highest amount of pollution in total?
What got me thinking about that is the EPA and whoever else won't let those 90mpg diesels in our country because they don't meet our pollution standards.
Terry
That is something that most diesel owners have known for a long time. Same goes for EV owners. Somehow all those fantastic cars sold in Europe but made by American companies often in American factories just cant seem to meet EPA requirements or DOT requirements for bumpers. Somehow all those fantastic electric vehicles that GM has designed and shown as functional models at auto shows just never seem to make it to the public market. Think about the Chevrolet E-10 and Ford Ranger electric trucks both of which were capable of nearly 100 mile ranges. When their lease contracts were up they did not just refuse to renew the leases but most of the trucks were crushed. Toyota sold or leased 328 plugin Rav4s which achieved up to 120 miles per charge as an "experiment" to appease the state of California. They were wildly successful and the lessees did not want to give them up when the terms were up but do you think that they made any more even though they had requests for thousands more? Nope they came up with some bull crap about no longer being able to manufacture the batteries for them. These technologies are now 10 years old, so where are all the groovy cars that Americans want? I don't usually go in for Geordi's conspiracy theories but the facts are self evident on this one. The Federal Government and auto industry are in bed together and BP/Amoco is their personal lubricant of choice. Mahindra has agreed to play their game and is tooling up to meet all of the ridiculous restrictions in order to crack their way into the market on the gamble that the Fed won't shut them down before America figures out how they have been getting screwed all these years with Detroit crap.
My ten pennies worth as a non USA citizen, i tend to agree with you.
Our local motor industry was also protected by charging huge import duties on oversees manufactured vehicles to protect the supply and demand for local vehicles.
Times have changed however and thank goodness for that because now we have such a wide variety of vehicles to chose from that it actually becomes difficult to decide on what to buy. Yes this did put pressure on the local SA manufacturers which created opportunities for them though to explore the export markets. It only toughened them up and got them ready to operate within a highly competitive market.
As a fairly new comer to this forum and i've said this before, i cannot believe how limited you fellows are with the choice of vehicles that you have in the US. Something is wrong and it's not for me to guage where the problems are and yes obviously employment security and a support local brands initiative does play its part but looking at the current crisis in the US
and threats of manufacturers laying off employees is not nice.
Anyway my opinion is not going to change anything but perhaps venting your frustrations using whatever means you have may start opening the eyes of the policy makers.
I sometimes do think that these comments made on these forums are somehow intercepted by influential decision makers be it the engineers of DC etc and if only a small percent of what we say is put to the good, then we all benefit from the progress in the vehicles we choose to buy.
I'm becoming to emotional now to continue so i guess it's time for a Jack
