BVCRD wrote:
You said in a post several days ago, that you believed ALL 2006 and 2005 were affected by the TC issues. That it wasn't just limited to 2005 models. I meant that "most" CAC hoses will be affected at some point because of design. There has been too many off them replaced to discredit this on this and other forums. You seem to bad mouth these things, then when someone like me defends the 2006 CRD, you want to know book, chapter and verse. I speak from my own accounts and am intitled to my own opinion. Am I not entitled to that? I never make claims that I speak for ALL on here. How'd you come up with that? I wish however that "some" who have had difficulties with the CRD (2005 or later) would keep an open mind and know that they don't speak for ALL CRD owners because there are "some" of us out here that have had nothing but great success with them. They don't speak for me, and I don't speak for them, or you.
I think you are referring to this thread
http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/vie ... hp?t=17867 and no where in that thread did I say ALL will have the Tranny/TC problem. That being said I will say that DC , based on the info that MrMopr64 presented, did fit a 545RFE that was not up to the task of the CRD. I also was not discrediting your post about the CAC hose...I was pointing out that that was the only real info you posted in your first post. That is fine because that is what you have experienced. This is about telling a poster to basically ignore or disreguard posts by others based on our experience. I started L.O.S.T. a long time ago to give people information and talk about the Liberty. I am in no way telling you not to voice your opinion, but I will clarify anything that "I" think is incomplete. We could go on all day with "semantics" but that will not help the original poster. I respect your opinion and you have the right to voice it on this forum. Right after you point this out, you tell "me" that "I" bad mouth anyone who stands up for the CRD. This was not about the CRD...it was about your comment to disreguard the ones that say they have problems with the CRD...That is all! Now, you say that members that have had a problem with their CRDs should "Keep an Open Mind". How does that comment help anyone on the forum in any way

You have now implied that "they" are closed minded and that "I" don't like my or any CRD. Speaking for "myself", I still love my CRD and am taking an active role in fixing or improving any problems or faults with the CRD. I have been here since the beginning and have always been a fan of the Liberty...I am now a fan of the Liberty CRD...but...I accept the fact that it has some shortcomings as most vehicles do these days.
Back to normal programming

I'm glad we can have this sort of discussion without mud slinging. You no dought, can see my point in that a "sore" person can and does try to sway the general public into his way of thinking. Happens all the time. I just am not willing to accept that as truth. Some have had bad dealings with certain service depts. and that has left a bad taste in their mouth. It's like if I don't like spinich because it made me sick, then I go out and tell everyone who will listen to me that spinach is a bad thing. Some people love spinach, even if it has made them sick a time or two. That is what I meant by not letting a few sour grapes spoil your taste for wine so to speak. I never meant that this whole forum is full of sour grapes. No way! There are some very bright folks here, and loads of good info. What I meant by "keep an open mind" is that in the same way that I am expected to accept that some folks don't like the CRD, (because they have had bad experiences) they in turn should accept that I do like it. I don't think it helps the forum in general, except that it helps folks remain civil to each other. I didn't mean to discredit anyone, only to help the original poster realize that there are "many" CRD owners out there that are satisfied with their investment.