It is currently Fri Sep 25, 2026 5:44 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: G.M. and Chrysler Explore Merger
PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:39 am 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:42 pm
Posts: 392
Location: NY Mid-Hudson Valley
G.M. and Chrysler Explore Merger
Quote:
By BILL VLASIC and ANDREW ROSS SORKIN, NY Times

DETROIT — General Motors is in preliminary talks about a possible merger with Chrysler, a deal that could drastically remake the landscape of the auto industry by reducing the Big Three of Detroit automakers to the Big Two.

The talks between G.M. and Cerberus Capital Management, the private equity firm that owns Chrysler, began more than a month ago, and the negotiations are not certain to produce a deal. Two people close to the process said the chances of a merger were “50-50” as of Friday and would most likely still take weeks to work out.

A merger would be a historic event, with two of the most iconic names in American industry coming together to survive in an increasingly difficult environment. Both have roots dating back decades in Detroit and, with Ford, long dominated the auto industry — until Japanese and other foreign car makers began making inroads into the American market.

The auto industry is being pummeled from all sides — by high gas prices that have soured consumers on profitable S.U.V.’s, by a softening economy that has scared shoppers away from showrooms, and by tight credit that is making it difficult for willing buyers to obtain loans. Both G.M. and Chrysler have been struggling with product lineups that are out of sync with consumer demand for smaller, more fuel-efficient cars.

General Motors’ stock has fallen from more than $43 a share last year to less than $5, and it is burning through its cash hoard at a rapid rate. Chrysler, as a private company, no longer needs to report its finances.

The meetings between General Motors and Cerberus began more than a month ago, said people familiar with the discussions, and the companies have held several talks involving their most senior executives. Given that both G.M. and Chrysler are struggling, the two sides may determine a merger may not be in their best interests.

The exploratory talks have included debates over various calculations of the savings that would result from a merger, these people said, but neither side has yet to dig into each others’ private financial books and records.

At the same time, Cerberus is continuing to hold talks with other automakers including Nissan and Renault, said people familiar with the discussions. It is unclear at what stage those discussions have reached.

Speculation about a possible bankruptcy filing by G.M. has mounted in recent weeks because of the automaker’s dwindling cash reserves. The automaker had $21 billion in cash on hand at the end of the second quarter, but it was burning through more than $1 billion a month.

The credit rating firm Standard & Poor’s put G.M. on negative credit watch on Thursday.

But G.M. has said it is confident that it can increase its liquidity, and emphasized in a statement released Thursday that it was not considering a bankruptcy filing.

G.M. once commanded about 50 percent of the American vehicle market, but its share so far this year has fallen to 22 percent, according to the research firm Autodata. Chrysler had a market share of about 15 percent before its acquisition in 1998 by Daimler, but its share this year has dwindled to 11 percent.

How government and labor might react to a potential merger of G.M. and Chrysler is unclear. Antitrust questions could be raised, but political issues could be overshadowed by the precarious financial prospects of both automakers.

If G.M., the nation’s largest automaker, combined operations with Chrysler, the smallest of Detroit’s Big Three, they would create an auto giant that would surpass Japan’s Toyota Motor Company, which recently has been battling G.M. for bragging rights as the world’s largest automaker.

A G.M. spokesman declined to comment on any specific talks with Chrysler. “Without referencing this specific rumor, as we’ve often said G.M. officials routinely discuss issues of mutual interest with other automakers,” said the spokesman, Tony Cervone.

There was no immediate comment from Cerberus.

People briefed on the deal said the talks started as an exploration of possible joint venture opportunities between G.M. and Chrysler.

Cerberus acquired an 80.1 percent stake in Chrysler in August 2007 for $7.4 billion from the German automaker Daimler AG.

Under the terms of the deal being discussed, Cerberus would end up owning an unspecified equity stake in G.M.-Chrysler, people briefed on the talks said.

The ramifications of the merger would be enormous in the global auto industry. G.M. and Chrysler together would control more than 35 percent of the United States vehicle market, and be by far the dominant producer of pickup trucks, sport utility vehicles and minivans.

It would also marry such iconic American brands as G.M.’s Chevrolet and Cadillac with Chrysler’s Jeep and Dodge divisions.

However, the potential merger carries enormous risks. Both G.M. and Chrysler are struggling mightily in what is the worst market for vehicle sales in the United States in 15 years.

People close to the discussions said that if the prospective deal did not happen, Cerberus would probably look to Nissan and Renault.

But the marriage of G.M. and Chrysler has far more potential than hitching Chrysler to a foreign automaker. While G.M. and Chrysler may be hamstrung by labor contracts from cutting jobs, the two companies could combine dealers, product lines and advanced vehicle technology.

Bill Vlasic reported from Detroit and Andrew Ross Sorkin from New York. Michael J. de la Merced contributed reporting.



http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/business/11auto.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=GM%20Chyrsler&st=cse&oref=slogin

_________________
Image

'04 Khaki Renegade
L.O.S.T. Northeast #001947
Cold Spring, New York


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2008 11:35 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:37 pm
Posts: 7928
Location: Big Bear & Lancaster, Ca.
Not reading all that but.....Hemi Camaro?? :lol:

_________________
99 TJ
71 C101
04 KJ
03 SFA KJ Sport
LOST JEEPS So-Cal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 10:52 am 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 9:42 pm
Posts: 392
Location: NY Mid-Hudson Valley
I can see them merging but I have no idea which lines they will either sell off or cancel all together.

I can't see Hummer & Jeep co-existing in the same company.

_________________
Image

'04 Khaki Renegade
L.O.S.T. Northeast #001947
Cold Spring, New York


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:19 am 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 11:50 am
Posts: 1254
Location: Upstate NY
Drucifer wrote:
I can see them merging but I have no idea which lines they will either sell off or cancel all together.

I can't see Hummer & Jeep co-existing in the same company.


Dru.......that would be real interesting.....a HummerJeep......or would that be a JeepHummer??

_________________
05 BLACK KJ - 42RLE & NP242
Skids, Hooks, Bent Rock Rail, Lifted, A/T's, etc.
NY and PA and Florida ONF Special Custom Organic Trail Rash


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:24 am 
Offline
Moderator / Lifetime Member
Moderator / Lifetime Member

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:49 pm
Posts: 27226
Location: NOW Southeastern Ohio/ Tanzania
Albert wrote:
Drucifer wrote:
I can see them merging but I have no idea which lines they will either sell off or cancel all together.

I can't see Hummer & Jeep co-existing in the same company.


Dru.......that would be real interesting.....a HummerJeep......or would that be a JeepHummer??


plus GM is trying to dump Hummer anyways as its a big loss company for them...
but it would be a Heep if they combined :wink:

but this will never happen, they are just throwing things out there trying to survive

_________________
MUDD'S MOTORSPORT'S We do IFS lift installs ,
03 OVERLAND EDITION /Kilby-Skidrow-Mopar-4XGuard skids/ 2.5 inch TOTAL CONTROL JBA coilovers -JBA Arms/MOABS-31 FALKEN WILDPEAK AT3W / 4.10's etc, 04 Kilimanjaro Edition loaded, plus 05 KJ limited


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 11:25 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 9:38 pm
Posts: 12988
Location: Colorado Springs
Albert wrote:
Drucifer wrote:
I can see them merging but I have no idea which lines they will either sell off or cancel all together.

I can't see Hummer & Jeep co-existing in the same company.


Dru.......that would be real interesting.....a HummerJeep......or would that be a JeepHummer??
GM is selling Hummer,or trying to,as we speak.GM ruined the Hummer name :evil: with there rebadged tahoe and canyon's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:50 pm 
Offline
LOST Member

Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 11:45 am
Posts: 173
Location: ohio
tjkj2002 wrote:
Albert wrote:
Drucifer wrote:
I can see them merging but I have no idea which lines they will either sell off or cancel all together.

I can't see Hummer & Jeep co-existing in the same company.


Dru.......that would be real interesting.....a HummerJeep......or would that be a JeepHummer??
GM is selling Hummer,or trying to,as we speak.GM ruined the Hummer name :evil: with there rebadged tahoe and canyon's.
don't forget the *bling* a hummer is not meant to have chrome! it is suppose to be understated.

_________________
06 kj 3.7 nsg 370 np 241 dark khaki


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:57 pm 
Offline
Banned For Abuse on LostJeeps.com
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 12:40 pm
Posts: 2353
Location: Kettering, Ohio
That article seems to be missing some major points of interest.

GM will kill Hummer if it does not sell. Having jeep would give GM a legit off-road division.

Cerebus owns 51% of GMAC while GM owns 49%. This two companies are already in business together. Cerebus wants to get 100% of GMAC. They may be offering a swap deal. Cerebus is a capital management company with no automotive experience.

Many consider that duplication is among GM's biggest problems. Honda sells one Accord. GM sells 1 car with 3 names, thereby competeing against istelf for sales. Eliminating some current GM lines & replacing them with totally different chrysler-ish models may prevent that issue.

This would give GM their first viable minivan ever. The Astro was not a minvan by definition. It was a traditional truck-like van, not a tall staion wagon. The new Chrysler minivans are being rated above the import offerings in some automotive press.

Even with full-sized truck sales in the crapper now, Dodge's huge leap in truck market share came more at GM's expense then at Ford's. The merger would eliminate a huge source of competition & market share loss for GM's products. The imports are still minor players in this field. If gas stays down, trucks may come back.

In what is the biggest possibility, IMHO, a merger & re-emergence as a "new" company might put GM in a great position for renegotiating the union contracts which are choking the life out of the "big three." The potential for dumping some of GM's "legacy" issues from retirees may exist if it is a "new" company. That may be devastating for the retirees, but it would be a huge boon for GM.

_________________
LOST # 633
'05 KJ 3.7L/6spd/241 245/75/16 MT's
'88 MJ 4.0L/AW4/231 SWB HPD30 & trac-loc D44 w/3.73's
A dirty Jeep is a happy Jeep


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com