Lower Ball joints

RespectMyLibertay · **Posted:** Wed Feb 11, 2009 4:40 pm

I agree about the mix-up between whether we're talking about the recall LBJs and the MOOG replacement non-greasables. You thought we were talking about the recall LBJs, XR and I were discussing the MOOG aftermarket replacements.
As far as mileage on any LBJ...we've had people post on here that they've checked to see if their stock LBJs were within spec, and they have been...past 100k miles. Those are the before the many recalls OEM LBJs! But I wouldn't touch them with a 10 foot pole nowadays.

LIV42DY · **Posted:** Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:42 pm

XR wrote:

RespectMyLibertay wrote:

So you didn't tell of any visual differences as I asked about...does this mean your only confirmation that's its different (better?) than the stock LBJ is the part number? Hey I'm just wondering what leads you believe that it's better than stock. I think that part number's usefulness is only in application...as we've seen more than one LBJ with that number.

BTW I'm fairly confident that Troy meant that the greasable MOOG LBJs are made to MOOG's spec outside of Chrysler's influence, contrary to the OEM product still made by MOOG.

What you can't freakin read?????It's a K3199 Moog ball joint.The ONLY difference is it has no grease fitting dammit.When I bought the part it was unavailable in a serviceable unit.Isn't the fact it has over 100 thousand miles enough to convince you nit picking freaks it's a quality part?I'm done here.Good day girls.

wow!!! back up boy play nice

Sport · **Posted:** Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:23 am

Doesn't matter XR has left the forum and I don't think he will be returning.

Lower Ball joints

Who is online