Did you really site Wikipedia as your basis for argument? At the very least, READ what your sites, how poor they may be.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics wrote:
...Over the last two millennia, physics had been considered synonymous with philosophy, chemistry, and certain branches of mathematics and biology, but during the Scientific Revolution in the 16th century, it emerged to become a unique modern science in its own right.[6] However, in some subject areas such as in mathematical physics and quantum chemistry, the boundaries of physics remain difficult to distinguish...
And the simple
Chemistry that is found working in the Catalytic Converter is a far cry from the likes of Quantum Chemistry.
Sorry for the confusion.