|
Good drawing overall, but I think you have the line of force on the WDH chain going the right direction, but from the wrong fulcrum point. The end of the arm at the chain is not the fulcrum, its at the frame of the tractor. The purpose of a WDH is to try and straighten the hitch to be horizontal, moving the vertical fulcrum closer to the frame of both vehicles and away from the ball. The longer a ball mount is, the more pronounced a lever is created, so the front wheels of the tractor will be lifted with less weight on the ball. The WDH pulls downward (effectively adding MORE tongue weight onto the ball itself, perversely) but by locating the point-of-force as far as possible behind the ball, creates a "lifting" action between the bumper of the tractor and the frame of the trailer. If a WDH is tensioned too much on a trailer that is already horizontal, it could create what appears to be a negative-tongue-weight situation, which is equally as bad as the tongue pointing down from too much weight.
Again, this is to COUNTER the tongue weight, and end up with a HORIZONTAL PLANE between the frame of the tractor and the frame of the trailer... And the ground. The correct loading of a ball is what Jinstall said: Minimize the tongue weight. Ideally, it should be as close to ZERO as possible, neither negative nor positive. I've said before, this is DANG hard to do, so trailer logic in the USA is biased to "be safe and prevent lawsuits for the trailer builder" by biasing the trailers to 10% of their gross weight on the tongue. This guarantees that the ball catch (A weak point, admittedly) will not be getting pulled up on by a negative tongue weight, possibly causing a wreck from a loose trailer.... BUT it causes the potential for lifting the front wheels of the tractor with excessive tongue weight and causing sway.
I just got back on Friday from taking my 7.5x20' enclosed (And loaded!) box trailer to a shop to replace the ball with a pintle ring. The guys there weren't real thrilled with how the Jeep was sitting with the trailer, b/c the trailer was putting 1200 lbs of tongue weight onto the ball mount. Yea, I know that for certain, I scaled the trailer. The front was certainly light, and I am VERY not happy with how the trailer was designed, especially since I had intentionally loaded about 1000 lbs of tools as far behind the axles as possible to lighten the tongue. With a GVW of 6400 lbs, it obviously wasn't enough. That is being rectified now, and the addition of my motorcycle will add another 500 lbs behind the axles.
Anyway, the trailer handled just fine at 60mph behind the jeep, b/c I know how to drive it - SOFT. No sudden moves, and LOTS of reaction distance. It wasn't an optimal setup, but I needed to have the work done before I could pull it properly and with the electric brakes. I would NEVER do this for a long distance or at high speeds, its not safe, and I KNOW what can happen. I've lived it. Having load range E tires on my Jeep also helped a lot - The tires didn't even look like they were bulging at the roadway. 60psi 215/85/16 BF Goodrich Commercial T/A btw.
I'm going to have to move it briefly before it gets hooked to my RV in a few days, so I'll get a picture then of how its sitting. Would a WDH have helped me? Maybe. Air springs on the Jeep would have been better, and the best would have been NOT having 500 lbs of TRAILER DESIGN tongue weight to start with. This is a car hauler design, so maybe it is biased front-heavy b/c of loading a car would move the center of gravity too far to the rear... But even the guys at the trailer shop thought it was built a little funny.
The point - To prevent sway and make all the lines of force parallel to the ground for stopping and pulling... The frames and the ball ALL have to be horizontal. If they aren't, RELOAD THE TRAILER. Otherwise, you are risking disaster.
|