JeepinJarhead03 wrote:
structuring has came a long way
material longevity? maybe not so much
but you do what you can
can scale the rust off a old ford pre 60's and shoot a coat of primer and paint it and make a new one
scale the rust off a newer car and you have holes haha
Well first of all, the OP needs to realize "simple" has always been referred to as in how simple those cars were to work on. So the title of this thread is misleading. The results however speak for themselves. Of course I would argue the outcomes pertaining to both driver's of those vehicles. For almost a century people have been surviving auto related crashes that you wouldn't think they would. Granted safety has come a long way over the years but let's not forget that drivers of these new cars (regardless of air bags and safety improvements) die every day in traffic accidents. I'll take a '59 Bel Air.
Here's something else that is pretty simple - I could buy two, maybe three 2010 SS Camaro's with the cash I would receive selling my 1969 SS Camaro.
Which reminds me - What really bother's me about that video is that whoever was behind that crash test should get their A** kicked for destroying an American classic automobile.