It is currently Thu Nov 05, 2026 8:31 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 6:10 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:13 am
Posts: 1118
Location: DFW, TX
Well, I have read a lot of questions/concerns about the stiffness of the ride of the OME 927 HD springs. So, I did a little scientific testing of my own. My Palm Pre has an app that can use the internal accelerometer to log vibrations, like a seismograph. So before I took off my Daystar lift, I logged a couple of runs through some parking lots with various sized speed bumps. I figured that would be a good comparison between the two. I then re-logged the same routes once I had my OME 927's installed.

Daystar Setup:
OEM Springs
Rancho RSX 17505 Shocks
Daystar 2.5" Spacer Lift
3/8" top spacer plate
3 Ring Clevis

OME Setup:
OME 927 Springs
Bilstein BE5-D916 Shocks
Daystar Top Plate
1/2" DIY Frankie Spacer

Looks like OME is a smoother ride - In all 4 tests.

Y-Axis shows G's measured by the accelerometer.

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
2007 Light Khaki 4x2 Sport
- Debadged - LTT CAI with Amsoil Filter - JVC HD Radio - Infinity BassLink
- Iggee Seat Covers - Black Moabs - 265/75-16 Cooper Discoverer ATP - 4.10's
- DIY Franky sitting at 23.75" - Al's 4.5 UCAs - Trimmed F&R Bumpers
- Removed Rear Sway Bar - Removed Rear Vibration Damper
- 75k miles so far...
Image


Last edited by long_tall_texan on Sun May 16, 2010 10:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:11 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:22 am
Posts: 351
Location: West byGod Virginia
Ha! I love a good forum with engineers on it.

_________________
03' Renegade. Front Frankenlift II Premium,1 Conduit, Rear OME 948, Ranchos, Upper Iso, JBA 4.5 Arms, 16x7 4inch backspacing Black Rock Street Locks, 245/75/16 Duratracs. Lots of stickers.
WVU


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 7:36 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:13 am
Posts: 1118
Location: DFW, TX
omGoddard wrote:
Ha! I love a good forum with engineers on it.

8) Guilty as charged! :lol:

_________________
2007 Light Khaki 4x2 Sport
- Debadged - LTT CAI with Amsoil Filter - JVC HD Radio - Infinity BassLink
- Iggee Seat Covers - Black Moabs - 265/75-16 Cooper Discoverer ATP - 4.10's
- DIY Franky sitting at 23.75" - Al's 4.5 UCAs - Trimmed F&R Bumpers
- Removed Rear Sway Bar - Removed Rear Vibration Damper
- 75k miles so far...
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 10:28 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:13 am
Posts: 1118
Location: DFW, TX
Post 1 updated with all 4 test cases...

_________________
2007 Light Khaki 4x2 Sport
- Debadged - LTT CAI with Amsoil Filter - JVC HD Radio - Infinity BassLink
- Iggee Seat Covers - Black Moabs - 265/75-16 Cooper Discoverer ATP - 4.10's
- DIY Franky sitting at 23.75" - Al's 4.5 UCAs - Trimmed F&R Bumpers
- Removed Rear Sway Bar - Removed Rear Vibration Damper
- 75k miles so far...
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Sun May 16, 2010 11:19 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict

Joined: Mon Sep 04, 2006 10:12 pm
Posts: 2476
Location: Jamestown PA
^^^^ awesome :)

_________________
2006 Renegade. Completely stock.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 4:13 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:29 am
Posts: 5956
Location: Hillsborough, NC / Corolla NC
and assuming those are new OME's, do it again in 2k and you'll see a clearer difference ;)

_________________
03 Renegade (Black)
177k miles 3.7L gas - 45RFE
Command Trac / 4.10s
Lift: ft. 790+ rr. JBA4+
The last of the TrailReady Front&Rear Bumpers and TR Rock Rails
Jarhead Offroad light covers
31x10.5R15 RedLetter Grabbers on Blackrock Dunes
L.O.S.T #KD098632


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 8:55 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 10:13 am
Posts: 1118
Location: DFW, TX
They are already settled in. I have put about 3500 miles on it since the spring swap.

_________________
2007 Light Khaki 4x2 Sport
- Debadged - LTT CAI with Amsoil Filter - JVC HD Radio - Infinity BassLink
- Iggee Seat Covers - Black Moabs - 265/75-16 Cooper Discoverer ATP - 4.10's
- DIY Franky sitting at 23.75" - Al's 4.5 UCAs - Trimmed F&R Bumpers
- Removed Rear Sway Bar - Removed Rear Vibration Damper
- 75k miles so far...
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 1:20 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member

Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 9:28 pm
Posts: 1590
Location: Swanton, Ohio
This is exactly what we needed LTT. Too many people have been questioning our " seat of the pants " data and this just quantifies what we all already knew! 8) Thanks!

_________________
02 Red KJ Sport,33s,custom fenders,custom roof rack,custom 5" susp, cradle drop,V8 swap
[url=http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=64049]04 KJ, 4" Fox coilovers, Bilstein, 33's, RL front bumper
'05 WK Limited, Hers


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 17, 2010 3:13 pm 
Offline
LOST Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:38 pm
Posts: 152
Location: Chesapeake, Virginia
wow, that is pretty cool. thanks for posting. makes me feel better about spending the extra money on the full OME setup instead of going with a cheaper option. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Wed May 19, 2010 9:22 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 2:03 pm
Posts: 1866
Location: Houston, TX
omGoddard wrote:
Ha! I love a good forum with engineers on it.


x2. . .

_________________
In this war of lines, so many have been crossed. Where will it all stop?

2006 Deep Beryl Green CRD Sport *SOLD 1/22/12*
Provent, V6 Airbox, Fumoto, Samcos, GDE ECO & TCM Tune, Euro JK TC, Magnaflow Catback
245/70/16 Destination A/T's
Boiler's Radiator Skid Plate
Jeepin' By Al 2.5 inch Adjust-A-Strut Lift, JBA Gen 4.5 UCA's (6/5/10)

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Thu May 20, 2010 11:07 am 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 6:15 pm
Posts: 2733
Location: Atlanta GA
Mmmm, empirical data :)

It's good to know that my desire for an OME lift isn't founded simply in gold plating and drool factor.

Dan

_________________
Image
2005 Silver CRD Limited :JEEPIN:
245/75R16 GoodYear Duratracs
Fumoto drain | ProVent CCV Filter
Stanadyne FM100 filter | Cummins fuel pump
GDE Eco | SEGR | BoulderBars | FrankenLift | Frankenskids


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Fri May 21, 2010 2:16 am 
Offline
LOST Junkie

Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:53 pm
Posts: 676
Location: London, England
dgeist wrote:
Mmmm, empirical data :)

It's good to know that my desire for an OME lift isn't founded simply in gold plating and drool factor.

Dan

X2 :D

_________________
Light Khaki 2.8CRD: TJM alloy bumper; Skid Row &Asfir skids;ext. breathers; SAMCO hoses; Grabber At3 235/70/16; Fumoto; Euro TC; Odyssey PC1500;GDE FTEcotune; OME lift; lightforce driving lights;ARB diff cover;nylon fan+Hayden2905;ss vortex exhaust; Airflow snorkel; Frontrunner roofrack; rock rails


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 7:29 am 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:23 am
Posts: 2121
Location: Kentucky, USA
Please do the test again without the trash Rancho shocks.

I've run the Daystars with Ranchos and without Ranchos...and the Ranchos are VERY harsh compared to the Skyjackers and OEM shocks. The Rancho shocks are likely the cause of your outcome...not the springs and/or spacers.

_________________

2005 Stone White KJ Limited CRD 4x4
Off-Road Pkg
Trac-Lok
Emu 790s/948s
Skyjacker H7088s rear/Bilsteins front
15x7 Black Rock Lobos/31x10.50 Firestones
GDE HOT Tune + TCM Tune
Euro TC
CB radio
Thrush Turbo muffler
AEM DryFlow filter


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 7:33 am 
Offline
Moderator / Lifetime Member
Moderator / Lifetime Member

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:49 pm
Posts: 27226
Location: NOW Southeastern Ohio/ Tanzania
Trash Ranchos?????
Would not run anything else, way better than junk Skyjackers which are way too soft of valving, OMEs are even too soft in my book

_________________
MUDD'S MOTORSPORT'S We do IFS lift installs ,
03 OVERLAND EDITION /Kilby-Skidrow-Mopar-4XGuard skids/ 2.5 inch TOTAL CONTROL JBA coilovers -JBA Arms/MOABS-31 FALKEN WILDPEAK AT3W / 4.10's etc, 04 Kilimanjaro Edition loaded, plus 05 KJ limited


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 9:49 am 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:23 am
Posts: 2121
Location: Kentucky, USA
I'm just saying... Ranchos cause the log wagon ride quality. In the beginning of the forum here years ago people were running the Ranchos because at the time it was almost the only thing out there, and there were NUMEROUS problems with them. Harsh ride, bushings didn't fit properly, etc. Rancho is trash.

Run ANY other shock and you will likely see different results. My Daystar spacers + Conduit washers ride VERY nice and I am sure the OME springs are nice too but I don't imagine you'd see the same difference between the two if you kept everything else equal (i.e., shocks, etc.).

_________________

2005 Stone White KJ Limited CRD 4x4
Off-Road Pkg
Trac-Lok
Emu 790s/948s
Skyjacker H7088s rear/Bilsteins front
15x7 Black Rock Lobos/31x10.50 Firestones
GDE HOT Tune + TCM Tune
Euro TC
CB radio
Thrush Turbo muffler
AEM DryFlow filter


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 1:24 pm 
Offline
Moderator / Lifetime Member
Moderator / Lifetime Member

Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:49 pm
Posts: 27226
Location: NOW Southeastern Ohio/ Tanzania
Over the past 38 years of driving 4WDs I have tried every shock out there I think, most are no longer even being made. The Ranchos are a good well built shock, no noises from them and they fit without any problems on mine and several others that I have installed.
OME shocks...I have a pair sitting in the garage, too soft for me, feel like the Ranchos I had on for 100,000 miles

What causes a log wagon ride is the springs more than anything or using spacers on stock springs!

_________________
MUDD'S MOTORSPORT'S We do IFS lift installs ,
03 OVERLAND EDITION /Kilby-Skidrow-Mopar-4XGuard skids/ 2.5 inch TOTAL CONTROL JBA coilovers -JBA Arms/MOABS-31 FALKEN WILDPEAK AT3W / 4.10's etc, 04 Kilimanjaro Edition loaded, plus 05 KJ limited


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 1:37 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:59 pm
Posts: 5171
Location: Austin, TX
By definition a Spacer should make the ride non-linear,
you preload the spring by compressing it a extra inch and then the suspension will not respond.

- i.e. if you have a 400lb/inch spring - and you compress it 1 inch - then for the first 400 lbs of input the suspension with not move - it will take 401lbs of force to begin moving - so 0 to 400 lbs on input - no compression - no movement.

by contrast a suspension with a 500lb/inch - if it has 100 lbs of force - it'll compress 1/5 of an inch - so it's a heavier spring - with a lighter force - but it will respond - before the preloaded 400lb/inch spring.

_________________
2005 CRD
stuff
Skeptic quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 1:51 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:03 pm
Posts: 765
Location: Homeless in Vegas
I will say that the Daystar set up rides rough, there is no doubt about it. I love it though as it makes the Libby ride like a Jeep should.

_________________
Jeep, its a way of life.

06 KJ Limited
10 JK Unlimited Rubicon
14 JK Unlimited Rubicon
14 KL Cherokee Trail Hawk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 3:07 pm 
Offline
LOST Addict
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 10:23 am
Posts: 2121
Location: Kentucky, USA
tommudd wrote:
Over the past 38 years of driving 4WDs I have tried every shock out there I think, most are no longer even being made. The Ranchos are a good well built shock, no noises from them and they fit without any problems on mine and several others that I have installed.
OME shocks...I have a pair sitting in the garage, too soft for me, feel like the Ranchos I had on for 100,000 miles

What causes a log wagon ride is the springs more than anything or using spacers on stock springs!




So by your logic that would explain why my nice riding Jeep felt like crap immediately after installing the Ranchos...to the point my wife even noticed and commented on it, right? And so did many other members back then, which is why I did NOT use Ranchos this time around.

If you like the stiff, tobacco-wagon ride quality, go for it. Most of us prefer a smooth, comfortable ride while holding up the weight at the same time.

_________________

2005 Stone White KJ Limited CRD 4x4
Off-Road Pkg
Trac-Lok
Emu 790s/948s
Skyjacker H7088s rear/Bilsteins front
15x7 Black Rock Lobos/31x10.50 Firestones
GDE HOT Tune + TCM Tune
Euro TC
CB radio
Thrush Turbo muffler
AEM DryFlow filter


Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: OME vs. Daystar Ride Quality - Imperical Results
PostPosted: Mon May 24, 2010 5:05 pm 
Offline
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:29 am
Posts: 5956
Location: Hillsborough, NC / Corolla NC
shocks don't hold "up" anything, depending on how squashed the old shocks were compared to the new ranchos may have caused at least a partial over-reaction sensitivity to the new shocks

it takes awhile to break in new components

if it was stiff for some reason after replacing stock shocks in the daystar setup

it may have been that your stock shocks were blown and you were just riding on the coils

which yeah.. would probably result in a difference

I run the rancho RSX, no problems with any bushings, no problems with a 'rough' ride, rides like a caddy and has for about 40k now

to each their own

_________________
03 Renegade (Black)
177k miles 3.7L gas - 45RFE
Command Trac / 4.10s
Lift: ft. 790+ rr. JBA4+
The last of the TrailReady Front&Rear Bumpers and TR Rock Rails
Jarhead Offroad light covers
31x10.5R15 RedLetter Grabbers on Blackrock Dunes
L.O.S.T #KD098632


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group. Color scheme by ColorizeIt!
Logo by pixeldecals.com