OK, for those of you saying anything about the Scorpio...it's not fast. The KJ isn't fast. No variant of either has ever been fast.
But a five speed, light weight saloon is certainly faster than a pig-heavy four wheel drive diesel wagon. Perhaps you blokes have never actually driven anything fast?
Perhaps a Corvette?
A four hundred horsepower Mitsubishi Evolution III?
A Cosworth Escort?
To the gent that said something about Ford using the 3 litre V6 in the Escort...I just checked on Wikipedia and according to that, the apalling OHV 3.0L V6 was never used in the US Escort. Apparently it was used in something Ford called the Tempo, which I can only imagine was a name in jest (assuming you know what Tempo really means). We had some pretty cool Escorts though...Google "Cosworth Escort". I'm a Ford man because of those cars.
DnA Diesel wrote:
Seriously?
Okay, the Mercury Scorpio may be a yawn-mobile (I think shooting myself would be on the option list if I actually had to drive one of those daily; the Merkur XR4Ti was much cooler), but the Libby is...well...a peppy, economical Jeep.
It's a 4300 lb, body on frame, truck. If I'm thinking to myself one morning, "gosh, I want to get out and tear around the windy roads and have some fun," the Lib is not what rolls out the driveway -- I'd probably drive something with a "2.8L-equivalent" 247hp/396ft-lb. Although I do concur with your assessment about having to keep the VNT clean with a good crud blow-out once a week.
Cheers
D
It's a 4,300 pound, unitized body four wheel drive car that can go off road...not a body-on-frame truck. How can you possibly expect to cement your position using such an erroneous statement?
The Merkur Scorpio (sold in the US for one generation, until 1990 or something) is not the same car as the Taurus; not even close. It's a lightweight, rear-wheel-drive saloon. Why did Ford deem the US unworthy for their best everyman's cars?