Another consideration is that our 2.8L VM CRDs have wet sleeves as opposed to the newer parent bore block. As a rule as the cylinder walls get thicker the lower the engine operating temp needs to be and with thicker cylinder walls the coolant temp needs to be higher. Add to that the CRD has an aluminum head which expands ~ 2X as much as a cast iron head, that is why we have torque to yield head bolts to compensate for the expansion and not trash the head gasket like early VW IDI diesels did.
In
"THEORY" one could change out the coolant to straight propylene glycol, go to a zero pressure system, and make a 275f thermostat and greatly increase the efficiency, some MB 300 D inline 5 cylinder engines have pulled it off. If you had several sacrificial engines to test, you may be able to work out all the bugs like the effect of the injection system, glow plugs, ECM tuning, on, and on. But, like many theory's, they are built on assumptions and the assumptions need to be transformed into reality. With all the pressure auto manufactures to increase fuel economy, if it were practical, VM would have done it.
If anyone wants to turn a theory into fact, knock your self out
