motorking wrote:
Hello,
I am the technical manager at FRAM Filtration. WIX filters have more pleats than FRAM for one simple reason- They use plain cellulose fibers for filter media. We use cellulose and synthetic glass fibers for better capacity and efficiency as well as better resistance to humidity.
For the guy using a washable type filter, look up the air filter test on the GMC truck forum, they paid an independent lab to perform a real engineering based test. The washable filters passed the most dirt into the engine and had the least capacity of all nine tested
And for those jumping on the "I hate FRAM" bandwagon, take a look at these videos
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mFVNESOwLykhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cttLaWepdL0And then make your own decision based on science, not hearsay
Well either your web search program that looks across forums for trash talking of your brand is working as intended, or you're a forum troll.
How can you talk about better capacity for something that has that much more surface area?
If your filter is 10 inches across and each pleat is .75 inches then with just this example:
10 x .75 = 7.5 inches of surface area per pleat x 2 because each pleat has 2 sides
75 pleat FRAM has 1125 square inches of surface area
100 pleat Napa Gold has 1500 square inches of surface area
Disregarding media, that's a lot more CAPACITY.
If you do a bit of google searching for videos not MADE BY FRAM, you will find several that show fram filters being mis-sealed, under pleated, and other issues.
It's pretty obvious to anyone with an IQ above 80 that if you didn't have a public image problem because of your shoddy products, you wouldn't have a search engine running across internet forums looking for people "BESMIRCHING YOUR GOOD COMPANY NAME" and running an anti-badmouth campaign.
