Hexus wrote:
My contention and thought was that the timing belt he just put in would be either damaged or stretched due to the problems encountered and should be replaced. If you disagree with that fine, but me personally, I would replace it out of safety sake because I (Like You) have lived this expense in person.
My argument with replacing the idlers is: "If you're in there anyways, why not replace with new? It's a small expense for the piece of mind it provides and while new parts are known to have defects and fail at times, they don't fail nearly as much as old used ones." HOWEVER, if he is just repairing it to sell, which may be the case, I suppose inspection and re-use of the idlers is not unheard of, many who plan to keep their Jeep have done this, but I personally would not.
I removed the Radiator and Intercooler and basically the whole front end to do my work because I'm 6'3" and have fists the size of Hams. If you can get in there and do all that work without doing that, I envy you and more power to you.
Ok, I will admit to having moderate sized hands... But I also think that by pulling the radiator and the front stack, you also create enough room that a 900 lb gorilla could work in there with a bulldozer!

I know the factory book suggests draining the AC and the radiator and pulling the whole stack, I never could understand why unless the mechanic was planning to sit on a chair behind the bumper. To me, that just opens up a whole world of other potential problems.
I will say that I forgot about the cams - that is a potential place for problems depending on what is discovered. I'm hopeful that there isn't any damage, based on our conversations about how the failures happened. It does seem that this mechanic may have fixed the cams being out-of-time, and installed a new belt... Completely ignoring the potential (as we know to be a certainty) that the rockers were trashed. That is the main thing that gives me pause... But we won't know anything until the top is popped. Even pulling the oil spout and trying to have a look with a scope... I don't know if that would even be useful, the labor still has to be done to validate the scope.
As far as the belt stretching from slipping timing again... I won't say it isn't possible, but I find that highly unlikely. I tend to think (in comparing old and used to new) that much of the 'stretch' is actually the tooth material on the belt simply wearing down in thickness. The belt itself has layers of kevlar in it. That stuff doesn't stretch, the rubber is just the friction and backing material to protect the kevlar. We would know while assembling it anyway, and the tensioner has the ability to recover a LOT of slack from where a fresh belt sets it. As long as the tension is happy, the timing won't fail from that. Elsewhere... Is another story of course.
I agree with the mindset of swapping parts 'because you are in there' if you don't have the tools / guts to go back in a second time. The decision comes from the place Hatfield's mind is at. I don't know if he wants to get out of the Jeep entirely, or keep it. He has made no bones about how expensive the repairs have been (probably at least some that weren't needed, danged dealer incompetence) so I will happily offer the counterpoint of 'this is the bare bones needed to get it running' so at least he has all the information.
I still have some thinking to do on my own labor and travel to help him out with this. At least the advantage is a set of eyes / hands that have seen this before, and if he does want to sell to a member here, I can offer an honest assessment of how deep the catastrophe goes.