Alright so I'm finally ready to pull the trigger on a new lift. Time to ditch the old Daystar and move up in the world. When I put the Daystar lift on I had always intended to upgrade to OME and Al's A-arms down the road. I am looking to get between the 2.5" and 3" of lift and I am looking for a little direction/confirmation to my thoughts before I put my order through. I don't do a lot of off roading. The KK is my daily driver. And the two reasons for the lift is for better ride quality and fitting 245/75 r16 tires. The third reason being that a lifted KK looks BA
I started researching this lift/suspension upgrade with the OME kit. My understanding is that the OME kit will give me about 2.5". Then I thought I could add the strut spacer plate set from JBA to get another 1/2" up front. In the rear, an extra spring iso to level it out. Correct?
As I did my research I came across the Tommudd's Econo lift from JBA which gives 3.5" of lift which is a little more aggressive than I had in mind. I figured I could skip the clevis lift that is included in the kit to bring the total lift back down around 3". Only problem is the rear springs in the kit are for 4" of lift, giving me 1"+ more height in the rear. Which may or may not be a problem? Again, please correct me if I'm wrong.
From there I thought I could piece together the Tommudd Econo lift and switch out the 4" rear spring for a 2.5" rear spring and add one extra iso. Theoretically ending with 2.75" inches of lift up front and 3" in back with my "modified Econo" lift. Yes?
In the end it comes down to this. The Tommudd Econo lift sits at 3.5" which is more lift than I want or need. So that is out. That leaves me with OME with the spacer plate (around $1365 with JBA A-arms and teraflex bumpstops) or a modified Econo lift w/o the clevis lift and substituting 2.5" rear springs (around $1300 with JBA A-arms and teraflex bumpstops). Both of which I believe would get me around 3". Is there any reason to go one route over the other?
Anywhos, thanks for the advice.