Joe Romas wrote:
Reflex.
Why don't you just go away since everyone has such a distored opinion of you here

As a retired computer tech I've dealt with software generated problems more then I care to remember. As a person who works in the
software industry for a very prominent developer your too hung up on defending your product

I realize what most of the decision making your talking about is true but try living in the real world dealing with problems in front of a customer.
You do know how many programmers it takes to screw in a light bulb don't you

Sorry my presence is inconveniencing you. Somehow I'm sure you'll survive.
And I was a computer tech for years before getting an oppurtunity on the engineering side. Its amazing how your perspective changes when you are exposed to the reasons behind what previously seemed to be foolish decisions.
Geordi/Saber - Hows life as a lemming?
Panda-52 - One thing I will point out is that the CRD has had fewer issues on average than the gas Liberty. At least from what I am told by Chrysler.
Kellog13 & Retmil - You guys are making my point here. I do not deny that some CRD's are lemons. Some of every car are lemons, after all all the design and engineering in the world cannot save a vehicle from a bad day by the guy putting the part in place. My ONLY real point here is that the CRD, while having different types of potential issues than the gas version, is not necessarily more problematic on balance(Chrysler's internal data backs this up, sadly its not public). Sure, in any random sample you are going to have some extreme results, but that does not make it the norm. As pointed out by others on this forum, a place like this does not collect a random sample of individuals, it collects those who are either enthusiasts or those having problems. Both groups are by design going to have some of the worst(and perhaps best) results, rather than the overwhelming majority of owners who have no issues at all.
Kellog13 - Since you have explained your issue better, I have to say it does sound more like you have a real problem. Once again, the issue I had was with the appearance that you were implying that it was a experiment vehicle from an engineering perspective, perhaps I just read that into your post, but thats how it came accross to me. Yes, I do tend to defend engineers, after all, we catch all the doo doo when something goes wrong, and half the time the decisions were either beyond our control, or the best possible solution even if its still problematic.
Goglio - Yes, I do defend the engineers, I mentioned why above. I am not intending to be condescending, however I strongly feel there is a certain sentiment here that Chrysler is full of fools, their engineers don't know crap, and everyone here should be compensated for the dire mistake that is the CRD. Certain posters bash unmercifully on anyone who dares defend either engineering principle(myself) or certain design decisions(others), or simply attempt to label them as company shills(retmil). There is little tolerance here for anyone who actually, you know, likes the product. And thats just sad, because despite the issues some have had, the vast majority of owners have had no serious issues at all. If I did have a real problem, I'd hestiate to post it here, after all I'd just want some help solving it, not a page of Joe Romas and others going on about how much Chrysler sucks.
chrispitude - You are nearly spot on, although I'm an engineer far earlier in the product cycle than I think you believe(ie: I can and do write specs and participate in the development process to a degree), but I am glad you recognize the position even if you dont' agree with my approach. One thing I will say is that the crowd here for the most part professes to be very technical, and makes no hesitation to bash engineering, design or management. That has influenced my approach considerably, I feel I am doing no more than balancing out the viewpoint a bit, I only wish I knew more about engines so I could do it more specifically. If this crowd was more polite in its approach, I would be too, after all I don't just tear into someone in life who has a problem with a product I worked on, at least not someone who is being reasonable and who simply wants help or information on why a decision was made.