Sport wrote:
you can't go wrong with either one.
Yeah which is why Im on the fence. Really Im leaning more towards the grabbers as my budget got eaten into with the lift.
irollgen4s wrote:
Only complaint i have about my grabbers, is the weak and thin sidewalls. i got a snakebite on a brand new one, less then 500 miles on it, while slowly driving over some small rocks. other then that, they're awesome! cheap, and they do well in everything i've had them in, even mud. they pack like hell in the really really thick mud, which is expected with a AT.
The ones Im getting are the 10 ply e rating (plan on doing some towing) which are kinda overkill even for a WJ towing at the max. But I like to have a bit of leway and the E rated tires are $148 a pop. As for not doing well in thick mud, well I wouldnt expect an AT tire to do well there and I would definitely get the duratracs if I wheeled more often. But alas I dont and my budget being shot and realizing the duratracs will be overkill for my needs I think Ill be happy with the grabbers.
Plus they are supposedly a better version of the BFG TAKOs which I had for well over 30k miles that never did me wrong. SO I think Ill be happy. Sad I wont get the duratracs I really wanted, but such is life and I cant go too crazy with a newborn relying on my money.
_________________
Fran:2002 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited 4.7 quadra drive. 31in General Grabber AT2, OME HD, bilstein, IRO sway links, addco rear sway. Kolak 3in cat back flowmaster SUV 50, magnaflow 3in cat, airaid JR kit, ram air, P.I.E. aux adapter, surco 45x50, husky liners.
http://www.lostjeeps.com/forum/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=65276&p=719908#p719908