hyedipin wrote:
Yes, it is not the artists who are making money on sales, but it is the recording studios.
The way it works, as you know, it all depends on the # of sales.
If the album sells 10,000 the first time, the recording studio makes a certain money and then they consider signing up the artist for another album.
They pay fix $$ to the artist, rest they take the risk (or get rich). That's why you see "nice price" albums at the stores, artist already made his/her money when they signed. If they sell 100,000 or 1M. they will ask for more money next time they sign, since they have a record. Just like the actors, they don't care what's the box office on the movie, they take their money and hope that it makes money at the theaters. So they can ask for more next time.
This is why you see some of the artists start up their own studios if they have some connections and experience, so that they can make money by manufacturing and distributing the CD.
Dude you have no idea what you are talking about. I am in the music business and that is not really how it works. Yes an artist usally gets a advance on the record. That amount depends on the budget of the album. Lets say the the break even point of an album is 100,000 copies. So it would take 100,000 sales to pay the engineer(me), the producer, the 2nd engineer, the studio, the marketing dept., the sales dept., the mastering engineer, the duplicator, the distribution company, the song writers, and the advance for the artist. After all that is paid for then the artist, the label, and anyone who got points on the album will continue to get paid. We call that mail box money, because you don't always know it's coming. Anyway, if the album doesn't sell enough copies to cover all these cost then the artist do not make anymore money. At that time they must rely on touring to make their income. To put it simply, when you by an CD you are paying for more then just the artist and when you steal music, you are taking money from MY pocket.