A "new" logic model has been uncovered on this board. Knowledge gained thus far:Chapter 1 New Logic Exposed [cliff notes]
: Specifically stated, your democratically elected legislature adopts CARB's rules yet CARB has no impact on your state.
So you think that YOU should be setting the regulations instead of your legislature? It's CARB's fault because your legislature adopted their standards? That's backasswards logic.
: When you're a proud citizen of the "Death with Dignity Act" State
http://www.oregon.gov/DHS/ph/pas/index.shtml you're to accuse right-wingers of putting people down when ill. In times past, so-called right wingers only wanted this when a person was convicted of a heinous crime, usually with additional aggrivating circumstance. It was the so-called left wingers that wanted the right to die when they wanted and the right to kill if they carried it. To some, saving the planet via population extermination was OK (they never went first). According to this post, the rules have miraculously changed.
The point was that even rugged individualists may become dependent on the society which they reject.
: Point out problems with CARB, your lack of legal residency in California is pointed out. However, living in another state and defending CARB? Well, that's just peachy.
The inciters here were not 'pointing out problems'. They were alleging fraud and calling for jail without being able to define the specifics of the alleged crime or the perpetrators.
I'm defending the right of the citizens of a state to determine their own air pollution standards, and condemning the right-wing chorus of out of state ditto heads who want to impose their personal whims on those citizens.
:If you persist with CARB's failures, you are to be an "expert witness."
Warp seems to think that he knows more than the CARB scientists or the legislators who authorized and fund CARB.
: Rugged individualist? Not so fast, you had nothing to do with the Revolutionary Way, Civil War, Meat Packer Riots, WWI and most likely WW2. If you think you are self-sufficient, it means that you have not paid enough to others while they sit on their rears. You have no "fair share." Your fair share is redistributed as "the people's" share.
No, I wasn't involved in any of those wars or riots.
If you ignore someone because you realize they are more comfortable at a G8 anarchists rally than in a board room, you did so to the detriment of your manhood. Likewise, you are also chronically distracted. Somehow, when losing one's manhood, you are not to be distracted. Interesting. "Focused like a lazer beam?" Maybe. The reason for "Hanging Chad?" Likely.
Draw me a diagram.
boilermaker2